Transformation of triple helix model in the conditions of innovative ecosystems formation in industry

Authors

Keywords:

Triple helix, model, industrial sustainable development, production and economic systems, innovation process, ecosystems

Abstract

Growing attention to innovations as one of the key factors for ensuring sustainable development in the strategic perspective has determined their active study, analysis of causes and sources of occurrence, creation of formation and dissemination models. Models of innovative development have become the object of this study. The constant increase in the volume of interactions, the increased specialization of individual elements, the need for a sharp reduction in the time of product launch to the market and the increase in the number of subjects involved in the innovation process, closely interconnected within a single continuous flow, are reflected in spiral cycle models, one of the most common among which is the triple helix model. Innovative development presentation in the form of spiral cycles and triple helix models, in particular, served as the object of research. The subject of the study was changes in the triple helix model caused by modern transformations of the external environment and subjects of interaction themselves, modification of their roles and management specifics to achieve sustainable development based on the innovation flow. The aim was to develop methodological support for regional innovation potential strengthening through the formation of a unified environment based on the principles of open innovation and contributing to the creation of scientific and technical information networks, as well as opportunities for their commercialization. As a result of the study: noting problems highlighted in the analysis of conceptual models of innovative processes implementation at the present stage, as well as taking into account peculiarities of their practical existing application conditions and their development trends, the article describes the developed modified model of the triple helix. Authors highlight the need for an ecosystem approach to the consideration of innovation processes implementation and management. Such modular structural representation of it can be used to innovative processes implementation model, monitoring and forecasting the nature and dynamics of the structure and behavior of these ecosystems constituent elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

E. A. Kirillova, , Branch of the National Research University «Moscow Power Engineering Institute» (Smolensk, Russian Federation)

Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Information Technologies in Economics and Management

M. I. Dli , Branch of the National Research University «Moscow Power Engineering Institute» (Smolensk, Russian Federation)

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department of Information Technologies in Economics and Management

T. V. Kakatunova , Branch of the National Research University «Moscow Power Engineering Institute» (Smolensk, Russian Federation)

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Department of Information Technologies in Economics and Management

V. A. Epifanov , Moscow Power Engineering Institute (Moscow, Russian Federation)

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

References

Rothwell R. Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process // International Marketing Review. 1994. Vol. 11 (1). P.7-31.

Kline S., Rosenberg N. An overview of innovation//The Positide Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. 1986. №3. P. 275-306.

Смородинская Н.В. Усложнение организации экономических систем в условиях нелинейного развития//Вестник ИЭ РАН. 2017. №5. С. 104–115.

Smitha H.L., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges// Critical Studies in Innovation. 2014. Vol. 32. №4. P. 321-336.

Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorffr L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations// Research Policy. 2000. №29. P.109–123.

Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society // Industry and Higher Education. 2013. №27(4). P.237–262.

McAdam M., Debackere K. Beyond «Triple Helix» toward «Quandruple Helix» models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice//R&D Managment. 2018. №48. P.3–6.

Данилина Я.В., Рыбачук М.А. Системный подход к формированию эффективной национальной инновационной системы. // Материалы Второй конференции «Системные проблемы отечественной мезоэкономики, микроэкономики, экономики предприятий». Отделения моделирования производственных объектов и комплексов ЦЭМИ РАН. 2018. Вып. 2. С.101-108.

Mabrouki M. Patent, education, human capital, and economic growth in Scandinavian countries: a dynamic panel CS-ARDL analysis // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2022. DOI 10.1007/s13132-022-01001-1

Караянис Э., Григорудис Э. Четырехзвенная спираль инноваций и «умная специализация»: производство знаний и национальная конкурентоспособность // Форсайт. 2016. Т. 10. № 1. С. 31-42.

Лукашенко М.А., Добровольская Т.Ю. Цифровая корпоративная культура предпринимательского университета// Современная конкуренция. 2020. Т.14. №4 (80). С.84-94

Мусина Д.Р., Янгиров А.В., Харитонов С.В. Моделирование управленческих воздействий на субъекты агропромышленного комплекса в цифровой отраслевой платформе// Дискуссия. 2021. №4 (107). С.42-48.

Иванов Н. Социальный контекст инновационного развития // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2013. № 5. 2013. C. 17–30.

Taratori R., Rodriguez-Fiscal P., Pacho M.A., Koutra S., Pareja-Eastaway M., Thomas D. Unveiling the Evolution of Innovation Ecosystems: An Analysis of Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Helix Model Innovation Systems in European Case Studies // Sustainability. 2021. №13. 7582. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147582

Юревич М.А. Глобальная трансформация высшего образования: от традиционного к предпринимательскому университету // Journal ofApplied Economic Research. 2021. Vol. 20, No. 3. С.560–581

Sá E., Casais B., Silva J. Local development through rural entrepreneurship, from the Triple Helix perspective: The case of a peripheral region in Northern Portugal // International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2018. Vol.21(1). P.5–26.

Nordberg K. Enabling Regional Growth in Peripheral Non-University Regions - The Impact of a Quadruple Helix Intermediate// Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2015.Vol.6(2). P.334–356.

Ivanova I. Quadruple Helix Systems and Symmetry: A Step Towards Helix Innovation System Classification// Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2014. Vol.5. P.357–369.

Höglund L., Linton G. Smart specialization in regional innovation systems: A quadruple helix perspective // R&D Management. 2018. Vol.48(1). P.60–72.

Carayannis E.G., Campbell D..J. «Mode 3» and «Quadruple Helix»: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem//International Journal of Technology Management. 2009. Vol. 46(3/4). P.201–234.

Carayannis E., Campbell D. J. Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?// International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development. 2010. Vol. 1(1). P.41-69.

Markard J., Raven R., Truffer B. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects // Research Policy. 2012. Vol. 41. P.955–967.

Клейнер Г.Б., Рыбачук М.А. Системная сбалансированность экономики. М.: Издательский дом «Научная библиотека», 2017. 320 с.

Lew Y.K., Park J.-Y. The evolution of N-helix of the regional innovation system: Implications for sustainability // Sustainable Development. 2021. Vol. 29(2). P.453-464.

Костырев А.П. Развитие организационно-экономического механизма промышленной политики на основе многоуровневого подхода: дис. ... канд. экон. наук. Нижний Новгород, 2021. 228 с.

Farinha L., Ferreira J. J. Triangulation of the triple helix: A conceptual framework. 2013. DOI:10.13140/2.1.4161.1202

Leydesdorff L., Smith H.L. Triple, quadruple, and higher-order helices: historical phenomena and (neo)evolutionary models // Triple Helix. 2022. P.1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10022

Смородинская Н. В.Глобализированная экономика: от иерархий к сетевому укладу. 2015. M.: ИЭ РАН, 344 с.

Park H.W., Stek. P. Measuring Helix Interactions in the Context of Economic Development and Public Policies: From Triple to Quadruple and N-Tuple Helix vs. N-Tuple and Quadruple Helix to Triads // Triple Helix. 2022. P.1-11. DOI: 10.1163/21971927-bja10026

Etzkowitz H., Zhou C. Triple helix twins: Innovation and sustainability // Science & Public Policy. 2006. Vol. 33(1). P.77–83.

Geels F.W., Sovacool B.K., Schwanen T., Sorrell S. Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization // Science. 2017. № 357(6357). Р.1242–1244.

Chepurenko A. Entrepreneurship Ecosystems in PostSocialist Economies // Foresight and STI Governance. 2019. Vol. 13. №4. P. 6–8.

Chernova G.V., Kalayda S.A., Khalin V.G., Yurkov A. Sber ecosystem - the product of digitalization impact on intersectoral economic convergence // Journal of applied informatics. 2021. Т.16. №3 (93). С.57-68.

Одинцова Т.Н., Глушкова Ю.О., Баширзаде Р.Р., Пахомова А.В. Цифровая платформа как основа инновационного планирования в цепях поставок // Актуальные проблемы экономики и менеджмента. 2019. № 3 (23). С.97-104.

Kalayda S.A. Model of creating an economic ecosystem in the framework of economic convergence under the influence of digitalization // Journal of applied informatics. 2021. Т.16. №6 (69). С.28-42.

Published

2022-06-03

How to Cite

Kirillova . Е. А., Dli М. И., Kakatunova Т. В., & Epifanov В. А. (2022). Transformation of triple helix model in the conditions of innovative ecosystems formation in industry. DISCUSSION | Journal of Scientific Publications on Economic ISSN 2077-7639, 110(1), 16–32. Retrieved from https://discussionj.ru/index.php/polemik/article/view/45