SOCIAL INNOVATIONS AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATE POLICY OF RUSSIA

Authors

  • M. M. Imamov Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan

Keywords:

Social entrepreneurship, social sustainability, social integration, social value, social capital, social cohesion, social effect

Abstract

The theory of social innovation is an economic concept that has been attracting increasing attention in recent years as a response to the limitations of profit-oriented market approaches. Social innovations focus on collaboration, co-creation, user-centered design, and experimentation and are aimed at solving complex social problems using integrated system solutions. The article notes that although social innovations have their own limitations in terms of practical implementation, they nevertheless have the potential to create significant positive social changes and are an important area of research and practice for both scientists, politicians and experts. The object of research is society as a socio-economic system. The subject of the study is the social space of Russian society, the change in the state of which is caused by innovative processes. The purpose of the study is to present social innovations as an economic category and its connection with the state policy of Russia. Research results: 1. The key strategic objectives of the state policy of Russia and the goals of social innovation are presented; 2. The components of social space identified by the authors based on the results of theoretical analysis are presented; 3. The author's definitions of such categories of economic knowledge as social innovation, social integration, social cooperation, social cohesion are presented; 4. The components determining social stability are presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

M. M. Imamov, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan

Doctor of Economics, Ph.D in Law, Professor, Head. Department of Macro Research and Growth Economics of the Center for Advanced Economic Research

References

Тенденции развития социальных инноваций / Е. В. Попов, Ж. К. Омонов, И. В. Наумов, А. Ю. Веретенникова // Terra Economicus. – 2018. – Т. 16, № 3. – С. 35-59. – DOI 10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-3-35-59. – EDN YBCKBN.

Гусов, А. З. Сущность и основные концепции социального предпринимательства / А. З. Гусов, М. М. Эебердыева // Человек. Общество. Инклюзия. – 2022. – № 3(51). – С. 68-78. – EDN LZAHEX.

Миэринь, Л. А. Стратегии социальных инноваций и риски их игнорирования / Л. А. Миэринь, Л. В. Хорева // Вестник Тихоокеанского государственного университета. – 2022. – № 3(66). – С. 51-62. – EDN MKFSFD.

Полякова, Е. К. Как корпоративная социальная ответственность может предотвратить проблемы социально-психологического характера работников / Е. К. Полякова, О. И. Дивина // Научные записки академии. – 2022. – № 3(43). – С. 5-9. – EDN XYRQUN.

Colantonio A. Social sustainability: a review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods. – In: Horner, M., Price, A., Bebbington, J. and Emmanuel, R., (eds.) Sue-Mot Conference 2009: Second International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and Its Assessment: Conference Proce. Loughborough University, Loughborough, pp. 865-885. ISBN 9780947974.

Godfrey E. B. et al. A bitter pill to swallow? Patterns of critical consciousness and socioemotional and academic well-being in early adolescence //Developmental psychology. – 2019. – Т. 55. – №. 3. – С. 525.- DOI 10.1037/dev0000558.

Eizenberg E., Jabareen Y. Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework //Sustainability. – 2017. – Т. 9. – №. 1.- С. 68.- DOI 10.3390/su9010068.

Vallance S., Perkins H. C., Dixon J. E. What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts //Geoforum. – 2011. – Т. 42. – №. 3. – С. 342-348. – DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002.

Duran D. C. et al. The components of sustainable development-a possible approach //Procedia Economics and Finance. – 2015. – Т. 26. – С. 806-811. – DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00849-7.

Robèrt K. H. Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? //Journal of cleaner production. – 2000. – Т. 8. – №. 3. – С. 243-254.- DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00011-1.

Dasgupta P. The idea of sustainable development //Sustainability Science. – 2007. – Т. 2. – С. 5-11.- DOI 10.1007/s11625-007-0024-y.

Colantonio A. Social sustainability: An exploratory analysis of its definition, assessment methods metrics and tools. – 2007. Oxford Brooks University, Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD) - International Land Markets Group, Oxford, UK.

Blau P. M. A theory of social integration //American journal of Sociology. – 1960. – Т. 65. – №. 6. – С. 545-556.

Friedkin N. E. Social cohesion //Annu. Rev. Sociol. – 2004. – Т. 30. – С. 409-425.- DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625.

Schumpeter J. On the concept of social value //The quarterly journal of economics. – 1909. – Т. 23. – №. 2. – С. 213-232. -DOI 10.2307/1882798.

Васильев, В. П. Социальные ценности и институты здравоохранения / В. П. Васильев // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. – 2016. – Т. 22, № 3. – С. 159-174. – EDN YKJUUB.

Гимазетдинов, Д. Р. Понятие, социальная ценность и значение уголовно-процессуальной формы / Д. Р. Гимазетдинов // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия Экономика и право. – 2013. – № 1. – С. 131-133. – EDN PWZCNR.

Published

2023-11-14

How to Cite

Imamov М. М. (2023). SOCIAL INNOVATIONS AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATE POLICY OF RUSSIA. DISCUSSION | Journal of Scientific Publications on Economic ISSN 2077-7639, 117(2), 85–95. Retrieved from https://discussionj.ru/index.php/polemik/article/view/123